GO!

Using "positive training" to train service dogs

The Service and Therapy Dog forum is for all service and therapy dogs regardless of whether or not their status is legally defined by federal or state law, how they are trained, or whether or not they are "certified." Posts questioning or disputing a person's need for a service or therapy dog, the validity of a person's service or therapy dog, or the dog's ability to do the work of a service or therapy dog are not permitted in this forum. Please keep discussions fun, friendly, and helpful at all times.

Topic closed to new posts.
(Page 1 of 8: Viewing entries 1 to 10)  
Page Links: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  
Mario

Its-ah Supah- Marrrio Time!
 
 
Barked: Wed Feb 29, '12 9:26pm PST 
I was curious, how many dogsters here commit to using purely positive training techniques for service dogs? This can include positive reinforcement and negative punishment.

If you do, what type of service dog do you have or train? If you don't, why not?
[notify]
Ginger

Feed me.
 
 
Barked: Wed Feb 29, '12 10:41pm PST 
I'm a professional trainer and I also train a lot of rescue dogs with severe behavioral issues, as well as my own psychiatric service dog. I ALWAYS use positive reinforcement and redirect unwanted behaviors or ignore them. Studies have shown that this is how dogs learn best and by making the learning process as fun and as positive as possible, they have every reason to A. Want to train and B. To do what you ask.

I have HUGE success and have NO failures. And I turn out HAPPY, well behaved dogs, not robots.

I also believe that we owe it to these dogs that are dedicating their lives to helping us to make their training as fun and as positive as possible. I'm not going to thank Ginger by training her using punitive based training and shocking her or choking her, etc. And if you need to shock a dog or choke a dog or punish a dog into working then the dog isn't a good candidate for service dog work. If you force a dog into this line of work then you're asking for wash outs or worse. It's also completely unnecessary to do those things. I want Ginger to help me because she enjoys it, not because she's forced to or because she fears punishment for not doing so.

In all the rescue and training I've done over the years, I've seen first hand the fall out of punitive based training.
[notify]
Happy

The Boy Wonder
 
 
Barked: Wed Feb 29, '12 11:59pm PST 
I don't... I'll be dead honest there.

I always train using positive methods... I use food, and toys in my marker training program. Be that voice or clicker markers, I happily enjoy shaping behaviors and enjoy using a number of different methods. However there are times that I feel it is required to correct behaviors. Granted I feel the same way about children and adults, a well placed correction for self reinforcing behavior is the Safest way to eliminate it. This could be because I come from a heavy working dog slant, and started training in the biting dog sports some years ago.

I don't turn out robots, and I've rehabbed a number of aggressive and downright dangerous dogs over the years. I've worked with everything from pets to working protection dogs and a lot in between.

I Love my dogs... my dogs are my friends my partners and my companions and I would never use force to Train. I depend on my working dogs, and they need to be spot on to work, a blown command could mean They come out injured (or dead) when working around livestock, some of my cattle being over a ton. I also have to Trust my dogs as well, and as such I need to make sure all lines of communication are open.

I bring the same methods to training my service dogs, force doesn't com into it. I train, then I correct if something needs correction... it's called feedback.
[notify]

Rusak

Rusak - Give me the- sleeve
 
 
Barked: Thu Mar 1, '12 8:09am PST 
@Happy - I am so glad there is someone else on here that comes from training working dogs. Like you said, sometimes a swift correction is the safest and most responsive way to stop an undesired behavior. Just watch the reaction of a pack leader when one of the other dogs does something wrong; it's swift, direct, and then it's done.

Rusak is from working dog lines, and he is trained to do bite work. I spend about 10-20% of my training time in "corrective" methods, and the rest in positive methods.

I do my best to teach in a way that starts with positive reinforcement, uses correction when they deviate from a known command, and rewards after the correction for doing the task correctly.

I will say, however, that I don't see correction as being a good training method for teaching the tasks I need Rusak to do. I am just starting that type of training, so maybe I'll find differently as I progress.
[notify]
Ollivander

Super Silver- Service Spoodle
 
 
Barked: Thu Mar 1, '12 8:19am PST 
Both Sabrina and Ollie have been trained with positive rewards and negative punishment. They were/are psychiatric service dogs.
[notify]
Min

pink min (pink- pen)
 
 
Barked: Thu Mar 1, '12 8:27am PST 
min is clicker trained, we use +R and +P. smile
[notify]
U

I miss you, U
 
 
Barked: Thu Mar 1, '12 8:51am PST 
Anyone who's ever said "no", "uh-uh", "knock it off" or anything of the kind to their dog is guilty of training their dog with positive punishment. All of the quadrants can be useful, and it's a big lie to paint all use of -R and P as being painful or involving force.

- NoNameYet

ETA: signature

Edited by author Thu Mar 1, '12 8:56am PST

[notify]
Nova

1184372
 
 
Barked: Thu Mar 1, '12 9:00am PST 
I agree NoNameYet about the folks who forget that "No" is positive punishment! I will use "uh-uh" but that's the extent of my +punishment. Otherwise it is all +reinforcement and -punishment.

I think what the "positive" camp objects to is the idea that there is no way to successfully train a dog without leash/collar corrections and force and "asserting dominance" (whatever that means). Mine are all well behaved and they have never experienced any type of force as a punishment.

The other big training myth that irks me is the "dominance" myth. The one where "you an never let them win a game of tug or else they'll think they're alpha and won't listen to you!" Complete hogwash.
[notify]
Rusak

Rusak - Give me the- sleeve
 
 
Barked: Thu Mar 1, '12 9:50am PST 
The other big training myth that irks me is the "dominance" myth. The one where "you an never let them win a game of tug or else they'll think they're alpha and won't listen to you!" Complete hogwash.

Rusak wins at tug much of the time (okay always, LOL), otherwise he would lose his drive in bite work However, he knows I am the dominant one that has control over the toys. He may forget once in a while, but that's when negative punishment comes in; they are MY toys, and he's allowed to play with them when I want him to. wink
[notify]
Mario

Its-ah Supah- Marrrio Time!
 
 
Barked: Thu Mar 1, '12 11:06am PST 
I am a cross over trainer who was taught to be very strong handed and firm. This didn’t work for me or my dogs, so now we use what kikopup on youtube calls progressive reinforcement training. I think it is very possible to train any behavior without resorting to positive punishment. I think if someone “has” to resort to using positive punishment or other “negatives” (I’m using negative in a different way here, hopefully I’m not being confusing lol) to teach a behavior, then they haven’t thought hard enough about how to best communicate with their dog. IMO not resorting to corrections makes you think outside of the box and consider what is best for the dog you are training. That being said, old habits die hard, so I still slip up and use verbal corrections sometimes, but that is purely my fault for continuing training when I am obviously too frustrated.

For example… training a herding dog. For the life of me I can’t figure out how to not use verbal corrections. Even using and releasing pressure can be too much for some dogs. My other border collie Spirit is very soft, and refused to work for a very well known open handler at a clinic because he has such a strong presence. He is not a mean or overbearing person by any means, Spirit is just extremely sensitive to pressure (of all kinds, she even freaks out if she has to walk to close to an object or walk past someone through a tight space such as a door), and really, most training methods that are “negatively” based. She is a rescue so I’m not sure what happened in her past, but using any kind of traditional methods, such as a choke (don’t even think about a prong with her….) and even too harsh of verbal corrections and she will completely shut down, stop, sit or lay down, refuse to move, giving off clearly stressed signals, and she will sometimes even shake.

However. When you’re training for work that involves other animals (the stock) you *must* take into consideration their well-being. I’ve seen dogs that clearly should not have even been put on stock in the first place, that end up taking a big chunk out of the flank of one of the poor sheep. IMO these dogs shouldn’t have been allowed that much access to sheep or allowed to escalate to that type of behavior, and should have been taken off much, much earlier. I know that there are people who train their competitive herding dogs using positive based methods only, but personally for the life of me I can’t figure out how one would go about doing it!
[notify]
(Page 1 of 8: Viewing entries 1 to 10)  
Page Links: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8