|Barked: Tue Apr 2, '13 7:32pm PST |
|From what I hear, some vets have allowed tattoo artists to do their work at the clinic while the animal is still under. Personally, I don't like tattoos at all (though my rabbit does have an identifying tattoo in his ear, it was done before I got him, I don't consider that cruel)...however, he isn't the first to do this, and I don't think it was cruel or deserving of all the hate he is getting. Honestly, I'm surprised this is even news.
It was ironic to me how the article on Dogster lambasted him for the tattoo, but just mentioned the cropping in passing, like that was no problem at all. Soo, get upset by the tattoo, but cutting off the ears doesn't matter? If you're not going to be upset by that, or reason that away, I don't think you (general you) have any room to judge on the tattoo. Just my opinion.
|my posts | my page | msg me | gift me | become pals|| [notify]|